Apple targeted in new patent infringement lawsuit over video processing technology
Filed on Monday on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division and located by means of AppleInsider, the swimsuit from Dynamic Data accuses Apple of infringing on 11 particular patents the corporate controls. The patents indexed by means of the corporate are numerous in phrases of what they quilt, however they’re all inside the box of video manipulation.
The patents get started with one overlaying the enhancement of pictures in a video movement which can be “encoded based on previous frames using prediction and motion estimation,” and the deciphering of such streams. A 2nd, overlaying “color key preservation during sample rate conversion” includes the processing of a keyed symbol, whilst the “unit for and method of estimating a current motion vector” explains the way to estimate a present movement vector for a gaggle of pixels in a picture, which may well be used to trace the location of items in a video.
The checklist additionally features a “video overlay processor with reduced memory and bus performance requirements” from the 12 months 2000 for including an overlay to a display, one for lowering processing time and tool intake when encoding and deciphering video movement information, and every other for “motion estimation.”
The the rest is made up of a video compression technology, a “high quality video and graphics pipeline,” extra movement vector decision, a “runtime configurable virtual video pipeline,” and a “system for and method of displaying information” from 2003.
The 68-page submitting announces there to be 11 counts of infringement, one for each and every named patent, naming merchandise such because the Apple TV, iPhones, iPads, or even particular variations of iOS during the file.
The swimsuit ends with a request that the court docket problems a judgment in its want, an award for damages for infringement, a judgement and order discovering Apple’s infringement used to be “willful, wanton, malicious, bad-faith, deliberate, consciously wrongful, flagrant, or characteristic of a pirate” in order to award enhanced damages, lawyer’s charges, and every other reduction to which the corporate is entitled. A tribulation by means of jury is asked.
The swimsuit has many indications that this can be a case of “patent trolling” by means of a non-practicing entity. The swimsuit finds the corporate used to be primarily based in Delaware, and a seek published it used to be included in April of this 12 months.
Marshall, Texas may be a big venue for patent trolling, with hundreds of fits filed in the district yearly at the topic.
It may be published in the swimsuit itself that the company has a portfolio of over 1,000 patent property that encompasses “core technologies in the field of image and video processing,” with the swimsuit’s patents particularly sourced from Philips.
Said to be an “effort to facilitate the licensing if Philips’ foundational technology,” the company wrote in the submitting it’s “pursuing remedies for infringement” in venues all over the world. It has additionally filed enforcement movements towards a lot of main corporations, together with Google, AMD, Microsoft, or even towards Apple in one swimsuit in Germany.
This isn’t the primary non-practicing entity lawsuit Apple has been concerned in, because the iPhone maker has needed to cope with a lot of such corporations over the years, together with Uniloc, Soverain Software, Acacia Research, and VirnetX.
(serve as(d, s, identification) (file, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));https://attach.fb.internet/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1